Independent Digital Publishing · Research study

Where does independent publishing create the most avoidable friction?

This study measures workflow friction across production and distribution. Responses are structured, pseudonymous, and analyzed in aggregate.

Study protocol

Before you participate.

Eligible population

Independent authors, publishers, and creator-led businesses that have released or are actively preparing a digital publication.

Publication threshold

At least 75 validated eligible responses before a benchmark can pass the minimum sample gate.

What we do not ask for

No author legal name, email, address, account ID, payment information, ISBN ownership data, or manuscript text.

Known limitations

Publication format, platform, budget, channel count, catalog maturity, and production standard can materially affect reported friction.

Study registry

Independent Digital Publishing Workflow Benchmark v1 — canonical study record.

Study identifier

MINDSET-IDP-2026-01
Status: Collecting
Protocol version: v1

Study design

Structured observational self-report. Responses are pseudonymous, fixed-choice and numeric, and analyzed in aggregate.

Population

Independent authors, publishers, and creator-led businesses that have released or are actively preparing a digital publication.

Publication gate

At least 75 validated eligible responses. Meeting the sample threshold alone does not publish a benchmark; methodology and limitation review remain required.

Controlling methodology: Editorial & Research Methodology. Program status: Research & Data Center. Citation guidance: Media & Citation Center.

Participant survey

Independent Digital Publishing Workflow Benchmark v1

Publication formats currently used

Do not enter identifying, confidential, account, ISBN-ownership, payment, or manuscript information. This form intentionally contains no free-text response field.